.
Feedback

Can You Hum A Few Brands?

How advertisers go different ways to add melody to their messages.

There was a time when music for commercials came as a commercial property --securing rights and use from the original artists. Those artists who fought for artistic integrity and the avoidance of crass commercialism made sure that their music, lyrics and renditions were not available at any price.

So advertisers went a couple of different ways to add song to their messages.

One way was negotiation with the artist and organizations like ASCAP who could determine if rights to the composition would be available. I remember vividly studying advertising with a good friend in college who worked part time for ASCAP and when we created a Nabisco snacks campaign for a National student advertising competition sponsored by the American Advertising Federation, she was our conduit to insure the judges that the song we selected was up for grabs.

A classic ad example was for Nike who used the original recording of the Beatles’ “Revolution” in their ad for running shoes as negotiated with Capital-E.M.I. Records and S.B.K. (who represented Michael Jackson’s ownership of the publishing rights at the time).  According to the reports, since “recordings carry two copyrights, for publishing (the words and music of a song) and for performance, as embodied in the recording” Apple Corps Ltd and Apple Records sued Nike since the Beatles received no payments at the time.

Part of the tangle of lawsuits had to do with the Beatles and their record companies too, but Nike was reported to stop airing ads with the song approximately within a year of the original airing.

Companies can, of course, purchase stock music and own the rights/use of this sound in their commercials. But in what appears to be the more of the trend is when ad agencies commission new musicians to create new songs for products. 

This is clearly a win-win: brand identity and branded entertainment for the advertiser and quicker (if not instant) notoriety for the artist. Companies like Kraft, Chrysler, Pepsi-Cola, and Wm.Wrigley Jr. have taken this musical ride over the last few years with varied results.  

Closer to home, from a consumer perspective, there’s a note by my computer that reads “song from Weber Grill commercial” on the list of songs my teenager wants to buy from iTunes.

She’s not a consumer for barbecue grills right now – but she’s likely to mention the name when we go to buy our next one for the household. That's exactly what the advertiser hopes.

Laura June 22, 2012 at 09:14 pm
I honestly think that advertisers and agencies have gotten lazy, falling back on licensed songs. (I say that as a person who does that very thing for a living, for one of the brands you mention.) Gimme a good jingle - the ones from the sixties and seventies are still in my head.
Lauren B. Lev June 23, 2012 at 02:00 pm
Laura, you clearly know this area of the business, but it is my impression that the changing circumstances may explain how advertisers are in a different situation when it comes to securing music: hanging requirements for protecting and licensing music post-MP3 players and iTunes, as well as the way musicians get their work to be heard today vs. in the sixties. It's tough enough to be an musical artist, it's got to be just as conflicting to develop music for marketing purposes.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from East Meadow Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Rich June 18, 2013 at 05:10 pm
It's (was) Piesanos
Susan June 18, 2013 at 08:35 pm
What's to look into? Neil Koenig was the owner. He's good friends with my cousin. My cousin toldRead More me "he couldn't make a go of it." The last time I was there was in December. The food was just ok and the service was horrible. Not one course was correct and we didn't even change anything from the menu description. Note to the waitress, the appetizer is NOT supposed to come for dessert!! And Rich is correct. The name was Buongusto's PieSano's. I hope the new owners (Lia's) stop serving Chocolate Mouse (should be Mousse) as per the sign on the Prospect Avenue side of the building.
Mary-Lynn Karr Bonda-Riva June 19, 2013 at 06:27 am
I say bring Starbucks back!!
GMS June 12, 2013 at 09:52 am
3 large tables, of 42 people, yes, 3 tables 22 bottles!
Rick Price June 12, 2013 at 03:36 pm
Mike and Yvette are two of the nicest, kindest people I know and have always been helpful and fairRead More to the community and community events. While I am very sorry you had such a bad experience, I can't wait to hear their side of the story.
Frank T June 13, 2013 at 12:04 pm
"He just took $600 from our students funds" What does that mean? Either you handed himRead More money from the students fund or it was stolen. I would like to hear the owners side of the story.
Ivan Launer June 8, 2013 at 11:06 am
There are many people behind the scenes who have worked for months in advance to make this eventRead More successful. Due to business and personal commitments, it is impossible to get them together again on short notice.
Ivan Launer June 8, 2013 at 11:07 am
Unfortunately, the cancellation stands. Work for the 8:00 AM opening begins early in the morning.Read More The grounds at Speno Memorial Park were waterlogged, which could have resulted in slipping hazards and extensive property damage. If it's any consolation, we're as sorry about the cancellation as the people who would have attended the event.
marianne krause June 10, 2013 at 10:30 am
Extremely poor planing there should hve been rain date