Hempstead Town Clerk Mark Bonilla Budgets $600K in Payments from Hempstead Animal Shelter in 2011

Hempstead Town Clerk Mark Bonilla budgeted $600,000 in payments from the Hempstead Animal Shelter in 2011 (a 1600 percent increase over the amount budgeted in 2003 when he took office).

Last year the New York State comptroller said he would audit the financial operations at the Town of Hempstead's animal shelter. Thomas DiNapoli says his office has received hundreds of complaints about the shelter's financial management in recent months. One of these complaints included payments made by the Animal Shelter to the Town Clerk's office.

FOILed documents show that $600,000 was budgeted in 2011 for services to be performed by the Town Clerk's office for the Hempstead Animal Shelter.  In 2003, this amount was $36,700.  That's an increase of over 1600 percent in only eight years.

These documents also show that the only task performed by the Town Clerk for the Animal Shelter is dog licensing (cats are not licensed).

Newsday has reported that the shelter had an animal intake of 3,498 animals in 2010. If all these animals were processed by the Town Clerk for dog licenses, the cost for each animal would be $171 per animal (regardless of whether it was a dog or cat, or previously licensed). The license charged to the public for a dog that is not spayed or neutered is about $10.

The Town Clerk's budget for 2011 is $4,389,962, $4,258,962 (or 97 percent) of this is for salary and wages.

The $600,000 paid by the animal shelter to the Town Clerk represents 13 percent of the Town Clerk's budget. That means, on average, about 1 in 8 employees in the Town Clerk's office spend all their time processing dog licenses. Looking at the entire Animal Shelter budget of $6.5 million for 2011, licensing represents 9 percent of the entire budget.

Does anyone believe that the Town Clerk really spent $600,000 on dog licenses in 2011?

I have personally asked the Town Clerk, Mark Bonilla, at Town Board meetings, what his department does with the $600,000 received from the Animal Shelter. In each case he did not respond.  His department even refused to answer a FOIL request for the details of that expenditure.

I've also asked Town Comptroller Kevin Conroy and Supervisor Kate Murray; They also refused to give me an answer to this question.

All supporting documentation (from the Town of Hempstead), including the Administrative Charge budget for the animal shelter from 2002 to 2011, the Town Clerk's 2011 budget, and the Town Clerk's responsibility to the animal shelter has been uploaded with this article.

Felix Procacci

Franklin Square

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Cecelia Sommers July 16, 2012 at 05:29 PM
Keep in mind that the town of hempstead shakes down all their employees and our town taxes are raised every two years so that kate can keep her GODFATHER living in the style he is accustome too.
Lorraine DeVita August 13, 2012 at 03:47 PM
what you SEE is smoke and mirrors and what Kate Murray WANTs you to or aLLOWS you to see...600k and no one will answer the questions.. sounds a little like pocket lining to me and by now those pockets are lined in gold at the exp[ense of you me and the poor animals at the shelter. Sure Murray makes it SEEM like shes doing a great job to SOME , but if the finagled books were transparent it would probably be a very different story...
Felix Procacci September 21, 2012 at 01:44 AM
FYI : For 2012 the Town Clerk is not taking $660,000 from the Animal Shelter budget, 10% higher than last year.
dan November 04, 2013 at 07:36 PM
I fear people are too poorly informed to know the Real Kate. The figures are there showing her corruption and secrecy. The lawsuit won by volunteers against ToH animal shelter and yet people don't vote their conscience or even read the issues affecting our lives . I am guilty of voting by republican row in past. But now I vote based on people and their actions and inactions. At the very least my vote sends a message that I don't approve of abuse in any shape or form. She lied concealed , mismanaged shelter . Was sued and lost and people will vote her bc people will vote party.
Lorraine DeVita November 04, 2013 at 10:15 PM
I have said it before and I will say it again, Smoke and mirrors is what blinds this town.. people are Afraid of the truth... because it holds them responsible for Allowing this town government and Kate Murray and her puppet masters to ARROGANLTY and REPEATEDLY do what is best for THEM not for US. PLs Vote with your eyes open and ask your self WHY these people we have elected REFUSE to answer questions refuse to be held accountable and refuse to speak the truth. Is this the type of people we want or for that matter NEED in office. As citizens & voters we need to hold ourselves accountable for our actions we also need to hold our elected officials accountable and responsible for theirs. If we dismiss and ALLOW this to continue without consequences then we have no one to blame but ourselves. GO VOTE FOR TRUTH and HONESTY and vote for people who hold themselves responsible for their actions ..... don't let the smoke get in your eyes..


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »